Young-Jun Kim vs Tsung-Hua Yang Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W W L W L
Form
L L L L L L L L L LH2H: Kim 2 - 2 Yang
They have played 9 sets in total, with Kim winning 5 and Yang winning 4. The last match between Kim and Yang was at the Chinese Taipei F2, 16-04-2012, Second, Hard with Tsung-Hua Yang getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Young-Jun Kim | 2 |
| Tsung-Hua Yang | 2 |
Chinese Taipei F2(16-04-2012)
6
4
3
6
6
3
| Kim | Stats | Yang |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 255 | Highest Rank | 164 |
| 45 | Age | 34 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 11 |
| 66% (156-79) | Career Total W/L | 56% (454-362) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $38,500 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 2 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Mertens PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 41 | Games Won | 35 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Young-Jun Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Tsung-Hua Yang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Fletcher Scott
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Kikuchi
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Benjamin Sigouin
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
46%
(
21 of
46)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eric Hadigian
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
23 of
28)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
19 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joe Tyler
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
11
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
4
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
28 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
89)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
47%
(
22 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louroi Martinez
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Bondarevskiy
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zachary Svajda
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (156/79) | Win/Loss | 56% (454/362) |
| 66% (345/180) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (1031/850) |
| 56% (2688/2104) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (9166/8643) |
| 66% (140/71) | Hard Win/Loss | 56% (325/252) |
| 67% (4/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (105/71) |
| 63% (10/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (23/34) |
| 100% (2/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.29 |
| 8 | Aces Total | 2549 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1518 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 546.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 594.7 |
| 63% (67/106) | 1st Serve % | 58% (19077/32942) |
| 76% (51/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (13666/19077) |
| 51% (20/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (6531/13865) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1245/3007) |
| 36% (36/100) | Return Points Win % | 39% (12559/32601) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 33% (7/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/3) |
| 50% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 32% (6/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 39% (11/17) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (21/20) | Challenger W/L | 49% (204/211) |
| 70% (132/56) | Futures W/L | 68% (226/104) |
| 70% (151/217) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (438/787) |
| 33% (3/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 53% (9/17) |
| 56% (35/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (122/238) |
| 52% (26/50) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (120/240) |
| 91% (157/143) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (441/381) |
| 8% (157/12) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (441/60) |
| 19% (78/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (373/76) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
